We Never Needed Gas, Oil, Electricity as we Know it.. all the ENERGY should Be Free. The Nikola Tesla Story

JP Morgan and the Rockefellers shut down Tesla, his Patent's were Stolen. We should have access to Tesla's inventions, Tesla's Patent's should be available to all, propulsion should be in use. Learn all you can about ALL of Tesla's Inventions. It is a VERY Big Deal.

Energy has Always Been Free. Rockefeller and JP Morgan Stopped Tesla from Giving Us Free Energy, ENOUGH is ENOUGH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnAqCNPiVeY&feature=related

"When a young and gifted inventor by the name of Nikola Tesla (Petar Bozovic)
arrives in America, he first works for the famous Thomas Edison (Dennis
Patrick) but later strikes a fruitful cooperation with George Westinghouse
(Strother Martin). Together they battle against Edison in order for Tesla's
superior system of alternative current to be accepted by the world community
who currently uses only Edison's system of direct current.

Later on the
mighty financier J.P. Morgan (Orson Welles) joins the game as he provides
Tesla with financial support to build his Colorado Springs laboratory only
to completely dump him later on after he realizes Tesla's inventions could
provide the world with unlimited free energy for everybody.

See one of the most important periods of modern history and the tragedy of this great
inventor who aspired to change the world towards a better place. A rare
attempt of biographical movie production by the former yugoslav (croatian)
cinema, the movie being completely in english."

Also read the books on Tesla Inventions, the Magnetic Motor, Propolusion.. We don't need roads, cars, gas, coal, oil, nor to be slaves to energy they steal from wind, river, water and sell back to us.

Just as a Corporation is not a "Person" - a Church is not a Person and therefore neither have Constitutional Rights. The Individual has constitutional rights, its their body, their choice.

"From Maine to Phoenix to southern Louisiana, Catholic churches across the USA this weekend echoed with scorn for a new federal rule requiring faith-based employers to include birth control and other reproductive services in their health care coverage."

"Catholic leaders morally oppose those services and called the rule an infringement on their constitutional rights. “This is the government interfering in the workings of the church,” says Sister Mary Ann Walsh, spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops."

Full Article and Source of Quotes

http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/10314726-418/catholic-priests-urge-parishioners-to-oppose-federal-birth-control-rule.html

Be it Cancer, Birth Control, Disease, Reproductive Choices.. Big Pharmaceutical, Corporation, and Big "Church" is NOT a person and "they" have no constitutional rights. The Individual has a right and not a governing  power such as a Church.  Each "Individual" person gets to choose, decide for themselves, that is the Constitutional Right.

Pacificorp Google Search

Portland, Oregon, United States

IP Address:

Integra Telecom (70.96.228.30) [Label IP Address]

Search Referral:

 www.google.com — what law office does pacificorp use #1

Visit Page:

 www.tonkontorpsucks.com/2011/10/tonkon-torp-llp-pacificorp-klamath.html

Occupy Monopolies: Don't Let Intel Get Away With A Decade of Anticompetitive Crimes!

http://www.change.org/petitions/occupy-monopolies-dont-let-intel-get-away-with-a-decade-of-anticompetitive-schemes#share

STOP Intel Corp from running over Inventors Rights and Breaking the Law.  Intel Research Links

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/02/open-letter-to-intel-corp-board-of.html

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/12/intel-corp-intc-press-release-on-mass.html

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/FTC%209341

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/Mike%20Bruzzone

Federal Rico Complaint - IViewit, Proskauer Rose, Foley Lardner, The Florida Bar, Supreme Court of New York and More Protected by Judicial System, Demand to Know Why?

Hey Washington D.C., Psinet (38.105.71.72)  - I See you Investigating my Every Blog Post, Every Person, Every Document, Every Story - are you going to Do Something about the mass amount of proof and documents that Expose Corruption in the U.S. Courts, Over the Iviewit Technology Case and in the Bankruptcy Courts.  I Sure Hope that is Why your Investigating all my Blogs so deeply.

Click Below for Rico Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley and Lardner, The Florida Supreme Court, Florida Bar, New York Courts, Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Silicon Graphics, Real 3D Inc., Wildman Harrold Allen and Dixen, Eric Chen, Digital Interactive Streams Inc., Kenneth Rubenstein Proskauer Rose, Uview.com, and tons more.. Filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf

Blogher Takes A Look at the Kristen Herwitz, Blogher Post

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Referring URL:				(No referring link)
Host Name:				207.47.5.2.static.nextweb.net									Browser:				Chrome 16.0
IP Address:				207.47.5.2 — [Label IP Address]									Operating System:				Win7
Location:				Belmont, California, United States									Resolution:				1280x800
Returning Visits:				0									Javascript:				Enabled
Visit Length:				Multiple visits spread over more than one day									ISP:				Blogher

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage Show Full URLs
		(No referring link)
25 Jan	09:40:09	www.investigativeblogger.com/2012/01/human-trafficking-fighting-human.html
25 Jan	09:40:30	www.blogher.com/snippets/how-fight-human-trafficking-when-you-can%E2%80%99t-do-anything?wrap=blogher-topics/feminism/global&crumb=106879 (Exit Link)
		(No referring link)
25 Jan	11:18:19	www.investigativeblogger.com/2012/01/human-trafficking-fighting-human.html
		(No referring link)
25 Jan	14:44:36	www.investigativeblogger.com/2012/01/human-trafficking-fighting-human.html
		(No referring link)
25 Jan	14:46:04	www.investigativeblogger.com/
		www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0CFcQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigativeblogger.com%2F&ei=GtghT4r6HuTXiQLW6OCGCA&usg=AFQjCNHMcDldqKgIjtWiD2q17GNm9ZPIaQ&sig2=c5UtGycyAhXo1junfUKc8A
26 Jan	15:48:17	www.investigativeblogger.com/
		www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CE8QFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigativeblogger.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fkristen-herwitz-blogher-publising.html&ei=GtghT4r6HuTXiQLW6OCGCA&usg=AFQjCNEggEsDdnUI0KDOokaQZUje0bRgPg&sig2=EF3Lhu49dHruXIq9BUHiRw
26 Jan	15:48:37	www.investigativeblogger.com/2012/01/kristen-herwitz-blogher-publising.html

Kristen Herwitz Blogher Publishing Network. Blogher Blogs, Blogher Copyright Issues. Kristen Herwitz, Elisa Camahort, Lisa Stone, Jory Des Jardins, Blogher.

Kristen Herwitz Blogher Publishing Network Beef with Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

Kristen Herwitz, Blogpaws, Blogher Advertisers, Blogher Publishing Network,Online's Women's Network, BlogPaws Publishing Networks, Blogher Editor, Elisa Camahort, Lisa Stone, Jory Des Jardins, Blogher Framing.  Got a Tip on Kristen Herwitz, Blogher or anything on this post?

Email your Kristen Herwitz Blogher Publishing Network., tip to Crystal@CrystalCox.com

A bit about Blogher, Kristen Herwitz, Copyright Laws, Website and Blog Framing, Blogher Making Money from the product of others work, their entire sites and network.  And yet covet their own material as if it is worth more then the thousands of pages of content they use to put their ads on that is Other People's life work.

Blogher Says about Bloghher Advertising "Partner With the Most Influential, Social and Info-Savvy Women Online."  I say not so much social, info-savvy but content stealing and using others writing for free on their blogs to create Blogher content for them to post google ads and other advertisers, making money over and over from YOUR Content. Even if Blogher pays you once for an article, Blogher makes money from that Blogher Content over and over.

You are better off to post your content on your blog instead of Blogher, and set up your own Google Adsense or commission junction site, or other affiliates. And it is best for you to encourage others to re-post your content and give you a link back. Blogher does not want your content shared on other blogs, this is greed based and not about getting attention to HUGE issues such as Human Trafficing.

Blogher claims to have an ad network of 3,000 bloggers, yet do they pay them all or get them to write for free, and also frame the sites of others? And by this I mean Blogher frames the sites of others who are in the news, trending such as me Crystal Cox Blogger, so they can redirect traffic that my blog may get and get that traffic to their site. Blogher also uses my name to get traffic in writing stories about me because I am trending online, and then had a hissy fit and threatens legal action if I repost one of their post, though they illegally "Frame" My entire blog within their pages.

Blogher Editors, nor Blogher Legal Counsel asked my permission to "Frame" My site yet they did it anyway.

Blogger Counsel Kristen Herwitz claims that its standard of practice somehow for Blogher to frame other people's sites thing is that is stealing and copyright infringement BIGTIME.  Blogher now has framed hundreds of my blogs from CrystalCox.com - and every where that is linked from that site.  Blogher gets ad dollars and traffic to their site from using my site framed.  And when Blogher writes about you and links to your site they frame it.  I re-post a human trafficking story to support Blogher and to get traffic to their site and link to them and they cry copyright infringement, when they have used my name to post stories as I was "trending" and they illegally use thousands of my posts as content to get them webs traffic and ad dollars.

Even my YouTube Videos, my YouTube Channels, Hundreds of my Blogs accessed via CrystalCox.com are now ad revenue for Blogher.com - that is not FAIR to me and yet they threatened me simply because I quoted a paragraph from their site and linked to them, ON a Human Trafficing STORY? WTF ?


The Video Below is How Blogher Uses "Framing" to get revenue for them without paying those
who create the "Content".


Does Kristen Herwitz of Blogher Publishing Network know the Laws? Or is Blogher the only one that "Revenue", "Rights" and web traffic pertains to.


Kristen Herwitz, Blogher Publishing Network.




A Bit About the "Framing" Issue


Kristen Herwitz, Legal Counsel for Blogher says  "BlogHer employs a very common framing mechanism"  well re-posting articles is also "Common" yet she threatens me, and Framing is not legal or ethical from my research on the topic. 

"Framing. Framing is the process of dividing a Web page into separate framed regions and displaying the contents of someone else's site within a frame at your site. Generally speaking, site owners don't like having their content framed at another site, particularly without permission. At least one court has considered framing to be copyright infringement."
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/getting-permission-publish-ten-tips-29933.html

"If you set your website up with frames, and display an ad in one frame while someone else’s Website is being displayed in the other, the area gets very gray. You are effectively pocketing ad revenue for displaying the work of others. I would not want to be the one on the defendant side of one of these suits, because the resulting page may be considered a “Derivative Work.”
Source
http://www.theegglestongroup.com/writing/crlaw.php

"What about framing content from another Web site on my own site; that's permitted -- isn't it?
Framing is presumptively illegal. The owners of many Web sites don't want their content to be "framed" on another site for a number of reasons, including the fact that they sometimes have advertisers whose ads aren't visible when their content is framed somewhere else. When you "frame" someone else's site, you also give the impression, at least to the casual viewer, that the other site's content originated with you. Again, the best policy is to ask the proprietor of the other site for permission before framing his content on your page. While he might refuse permission, or place some conditions on your doing so, better to give credit where credit is due than to get a "cease and desist" letter and/or demand for monetary damages from his lawyer."

Source of Above Quote
http://www.csusa.org/face/softint/myths.htm#framing

What does WIPO say about "Framing"
"g) Some Internet practices may raise trademark issues, such as metatagging, linking & framing, and using trademarks in domain names (see below). You should be careful to check the law that applies to your business on this issue and to ensure that you have permission to show trademarks owned by other companies, if the law requires it."
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/business_website.htm

And what state laws do Blogher get to use to decide if framing is LEGAL for them?  If I am based out of Montana and they are Based out of California and they steal my entire blog content to direct traffic to them, without my permission, what state laws apply?

More links on the act of FRAMING to use My Work for Blogher.com to make ad dollars
I intend to Sue Blogher for Framing my Blog as in this CNN Lawsuit,

"Framing is the process of dividing a Web page into separate framed regions and displaying the contents of someone else's site within a frame at your site. Generally speaking, site owners don't like having their content framed at another site, particularly without permission. At least one court has considered framing to be a copyright infringement, and in another case, CNN sued a news website that framed CNN news content. Under the terms of a settlement agreement, the news website agreed to stop framing and instead use text-only links."
Source of above Quote
http://www.garage.com/resources/reference/internet_tentips.shtml

Blogher Frames Our Blogs without Blogher asking our Permission to make ad dollars, revenue from our content and they do it to a whole lot of you.

"Framing is dividing a webpage into sections that display the contents of someone else's website within the sections on your website. Avoid framing others' material without first getting their permission. Courts have started to rule that framing constitutes copyright infringement."
Source of Above Quote
http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/copyright/copyright-realworld/website-content-permission.html

"Incorporating copyrighted web content by usage of framing has led to contentious litigation. Frames can be used for web pages belonging to the original site, or to load pages from other sites into a customized arrangement of frames that provide a generalized interface without actually requiring the viewer to browse the linked site from that site's URLs and interfaces."
Source of above quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlinking_and_framing

"Framing occurs when one Web site incorporates another site’s web pages into a browser window with the first site’s own content. The webite with the frame may post navigation tools, text, trademarks and/or advertising that the framed website is unable to control.

As more of the second site is incorporated into the first, the possibility that users may become confused over affiliation, endorsement or sponsorship becomes stronger. On the other hand, it may be that the marketplace understands frames for what they typically are–simply a way to feature another site which conveys no implication of affiliation or endorsement.

The unauthorized use of framing has been challenged under a variety of legal theories, including copyright and trademark infringement, unfair or deceptive trade practices, false designation of origin (passing off), false light and false advertising.

The Washington Post Co. v. Total News, Inc. et al., No. 97 Civ. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 1997). Various news organizations sued Total News for linking to plaintiffs’ websites and framing their content within the Total News home page. Plaintiffs alleged claims for misappropriation, federal trademark dilution, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, copyright infringement, and various state claims.

The case settled in early June 1997 based on defendant’s agreement to stop framing content from plaintiffs’ sites. See also Order, Washington Post v. Gator Corp., No. 02-909-A (E.D. Va. 2002) (granting temporary injunction preventing Gator from delivering pop-up ads to plaintiffs’ websites that allegedly altered the intended appearance of the websites, interfered with the Web site operators’ ability to sell their own ads, decreased the value of these ads on the sites and misled users. The suit was settled with the outcome sealed by the court). See http://news.com.com/2100-1023-983870.html.

Futuredontics Inc. v. Applied Anagramic Inc., 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d 2005 (C.D. Cal. 1998). Plaintiff alleged that defendant’s website, which framed content from plaintiff’s website, constituted copyright infringement. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied, where the court was unpersuaded by either party’s reliance on prior case law.

Plaintiff relied on Mirage Editions Inc. v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1988) for the position that the framing constituted the infringing creation of a derivative work. Defendant relied on Lewis Galoob Toys Inc. v. Nintendo of Am. Inc., 964 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1992) for the position that no derivative work is created by framing, since no portion of the copyrighted work is incorporated in a concrete or permanent form. The court held that neither decision controlled."

Source of Above "Framing" information
http://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Copyright:_Infringement_Issues

We are about to see how expensive a Lawsuit can be in a "Framing" "Copyright" dispute as coming soon I will be filing a lawsuit against Blogher for "Framing" my Entire Blog Network and placing their ads on top, without my permission and I have over 400 Blogs.

Framing as an "Issue" Research Link
http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw/Framing.htm

http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter6/6-c.html

Fair Use Research Links

"Non-commercial use is often fair use. Violations often occur when the use is motivated primarily by a desire for commercial gain. The fact that a work is published primarily for private commercial gain weighs against a finding of fair use. For example, using the Bob Dylan line "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows" in a poem published in a small literary journal would probably be a fair use; using the same line in an advertisement for raincoats probably would not be."
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fair-use-rule-copyright-material-30100.html

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/ has no ads, and is not commercial really so fair use does not even seem to apply.  I was getting a massively important issue heard on my investigative blogger network. This blog does not "COMPETE" with the source site Blogher, yet Blogher competes directly with me by framing my entire site and every blog I have linked from it
http://www.blogher.com/frame.php?url=http://www.crystalcox.com

Much more coming on this Topic, on the Human Trafficking article and how "Blogher" operates their business in such a way as to use thousands of pages of other people's content, even if you have a youTube video that they cannot embed  framing it makes this video on your blog, their "Content" in which they have ads on in the upper left and a link to Blogher, and their logo as if it is their site.  Yet Blogher, Kristen Herwitz threatens me for quoting a small post on a MAJOR issue, and linking to the source post on their site.  Stay Tuned, as I now have a very big beef with Blogher and looks like we are all going to sue each other, will let you know how it works out.  Should be filed in Belmont San Mateo County, California where Blogher is based.

Kristen Herwitz Blogher Publishing Network.

Power Corrupts Again, David Schied, GRIP, Government Reform

Stolen Military Technology, University of Michigan.

Government Officials are participating.

Discera



                                             http://www.PowerCorruptsAgain.com/

GMAC Mortgage lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage when it initiated the foreclosure proceedings

"
PATTERSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

Reginald A. Patterson and Diana V. Patterson, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC.
No. 2100490.
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals.
Decided January 20, 2012.

On appeal, the Pattersons assert, among other things, that the trial court erred in determining that the foreclosure was valid. While the Pattersons’ appeal was pending, this court delivered its decision in Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] ___ So. 3d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011).

In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP (“BAC”), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant’s house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

BAC then held a foreclosure sale at which it purchased Sturdivant’s house, and the auctioneer executed a foreclosure deed purporting to convey title to Sturdivant’s house to BAC. BAC was assigned the mortgage the same day as the foreclosure sale.

Thereafter, BAC brought an ejectment action against Sturdivant, claiming that it owned title to her house by virtue of the foreclosure deed. After the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of BAC, Sturdivant appealed to the supreme court, which transferred her appeal to this court. We held that BAC lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage because it had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings and that, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid.

We further held that, because the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid, BAC did not acquire legal title to Sturdivant’s house through the foreclosure deed and thus BAC did not own an interest in the house when it commenced its ejectment action.

We further held that, because BAC did not own any interest in Sturdivant’s house when it commenced its ejectment action, BAC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action.

Because BAC did not have standing to bring its ejectment action and the trial court never acquired jurisdiction over the ejectment action, we held that the judgment of the trial court was void, and we vacated that judgment.

Moreover, because a void judgment will not support an appeal, we dismissed the appeal.
In the case now before us, GMAC Mortgage, like BAC in Sturdivant, had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings.

Consequently, under our holding in Sturdivant, GMAC Mortgage lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage when it initiated the foreclosure proceedings, and, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed upon which GMAC based it ejectment claim are invalid.

Moreover, under our holding in Sturdivant, because GMAC Mortgage did not own any interest in the house, it lacked standing to bring its ejectment action against the Pattersons.

Because GMAC Mortgage lacked standing to bring the ejectment action, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is void and is hereby vacated. Moreover, because a void judgment will not support an appeal, we dismiss this appeal. Id.

JUDGMENT VACATED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Pittman, Thomas, and Moore, JJ., concur.
Thompson, P.J., concurs in the result, with writing.
Bryan, J., dissents, with writing.
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge, concurring in the result.
Or as Garfield puts it…

With those words tens of thousands of foreclosures, if not millions, are cast into doubt and, in Alabama — arguably the most conservative state in the nation, thousands of foreclosures can be overturned after eviction, after the sale at “auction” because if the creditor did not have proof of the sale of the loan (including payment, to complete the transaction, then they couldn’t very well initiate any Notice of Default, Notice of Sale, or submit a “credit bid” at auction, simply because they were not the creditor."

Source of Above
http://4closurefraud.org/2012/01/24/bam-patterson-v-gmac-mortgage-llc-judgment-vacated-no-assignment-gmac-mortgage-did-not-own-any-interest-in-the-house/

Legal Decision
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20ALCO%2020120120002.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR

Is the Name of your home WiFi Network, that is visible to others, under the First Amendment Freedom of Speech?

"The New York Daily News reports:

A bigot named their WiFi signal “F— All Jews and N—-” — and now cops are investigating.
The hateful signal I.D. popped up on the iPhone of a 28-year-old mom inside a Teaneck, N.J. recreation center, where her 3-year-old daughter was attending dance class....
The Teaneck Police Department Juvenile Bureau and the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office Computer Crime Unit are investigating it as a “possible bias crime,” Wilson said.

It should go without saying that the WiFi guy is scum, but scum have First Amendment rights, too. He has the First Amendment right to put up a sign in his window saying “Fuck All Jews and Niggers” — or burn a flag on his front lawn, or display blasphemous images where others might see them — though such speech would be understandably offensive to neighbors and passersby.

Likewise, he has the right to attach such a name to his WiFi network, even though the name would be visible to neighboring WiFi users."

Source and Full Post

http://volokh.com/2012/01/20/crime-to-have-a-racist-wifi-network-name/

Crystal Cox Blogger, a bit of a Rant.. and a Few Tidbits

David Aman Portland - David Aman Portland searched over and over on my blogs

Obsidian V. Crystal Cox Blogger will certainly David Aman Portland, Tonkon Torps Legacy.

http://www.obsidianvcox.com/

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

David Aman Portland Links to Research David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland

David Aman Portland


David Aman Portland



David Aman Portland

Investors in Ponzi scheme sue Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and Parke

Investors in Ponzi scheme sue Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne &; Parke

"Investors in Ponzi scheme sue Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne &; Parke
1/3/2012COMMENTS

Jan 3 (Reuters) (UPDATE 1) - A group of investor clients of Stanford Financial Group is suing law firms Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne &; Parke and a partner who worked at both firms for millions the plaintiffs say they lost in a bogus investment scheme.

The lawsuit filed in Texas state court in Houston on Dec. 30 alleges that attorney Thomas Sjoblom, while practicing first at Chadbourne &; Parke and then at Proskauer Rose, conspired to defraud 49 plaintiffs from Mexico who unknowingly invested in a Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Allen Stanford. The plaintiffs also allege that the two law firms negligently retained and supervised Sjoblom and are responsible for his alleged wrongdoing.

Also on Dec. 30, the plantiffs' law firm, Castillo & Snyder, filed another lawsuit seeking class-action status in the same court on behalf of 49 plaintiffs, alleging nearly identical causes of action against Sjoblom and the two law firms. The named plaintiffs in that action are not parties to the first lawsuit. Edward Snyder, of Castillo & Snyder, did not respond to requests for comment.

A federal district court on Oct. 21 dismissed similar claims against the same defendants. U.S. District Judge David Godbey in Dallas ruled that federal securities law pre-empted the claims made by the plaintiffs in that case, which were grounded in state law. Those plaintiffs are appealing.

In February 2009, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Stanford and three of his companies with "massive" fraud stemming from a $8 billion phony certificate of deposit program at Antigua-based Stanford International Bank. Stanford is currently in jail, and on Dec. 30, he filed court papers in Houston federal court seeking to delay his Jan. 23 trial by three months.

In August 2009, Sjoblom resigned from Proskauer Rose, where he had worked since 2006. He practiced at Chadbourne from 2006 to 2009, according to the website of the Law Office of Thomas V. Sjoblom in Washington. Reached by phone Tuesday, Sjoblom, who was an assistant chief litigation counsel at the SEC from 1987 to 1999, said he had not seen the latest lawsuit and declined to comment. He directed calls to the two law firms.

The lawsuit filed Dec. 30 alleges that Sjoblom helped thwart an investigation by regulators into Stanford's financial activities and helped him evade Texas securities laws. The complaint, which seeks unspecified actual and punitive damages, also asserts that the law firms were negligent in hiring and supervising Sjoblom.

Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne &; Parke did not respond to requests for comment.

The case is Martin v. Proskauer Rose, No. 2011-77800, Harris County Court, Texas.

For the plaintiffs: Edward Snyder, Castillo Snyder, San Antonio, Texas.

For the defendants: Not immediately available.

(Reporting by Leigh Jones)"

Source of Proskauer Rose Post
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2012/01_-_January/Investors_in_Ponzi_scheme_sue_Proskauer_Rose,_Chadbourne___Parke/

Blogs Are not Only Media, but Real News about what people are really experiencing and with documents, videos and proof.

Keep Blogging, Blogs are a better source of real news and information..

Sending Kids to Jail for Money, Judge do this in Montana as Well. CPS is corrupt and NOT accountable, Our Kids pay the Price

We must Stand United against corruption, these people's lives matter..

Make a Stand Against Corrupt Judges, CPS Corruption, Social Workers that are corrupt and the families, children, lives that pay the price

Watch live streaming video from lawlessamerica at livestream.com

Accountability, Honesty, Transparency in Government. Stop the Wall of Corruption

"One aspect of our proposed plan for dealing with government and judicial corruption is to ask all elected and appointed government officials and all political candidates to sign an Honesty Contract with the Citizens of the United States of America.

This page will list all government officials who sign the Honesty Contract. 

Reuben Torres, Board of Freeholders candidate for Essex County New Jersey, is the first candidate for elected office in the United States to execute an Honesty Contract with the Citizens of the United States. 

We want all of our supporters to vote only for candidates who have signed the Contract. 

Download a copy of the Contract here."

Source

http://www.getagripamerica.us/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=185&Itemid=106