Cox saw the case online, contacted the courts and had the nerve, the courage to serve herself and to stand up to Marc Randazza and FIGHT. It has been headed to 2 years now of Randazza v. Cox, and Crystal Cox is still speaking the TRUTH. Marc Randazza is still flat out lying in Judicial Pleadings in order to “save face”, protect his ego, and suppress free speech and first amendment rights in an open market place of ideas.
"Attorneys Beware: The Publishing of Judicial Pleadings to the Press and on
the Internet May Lose Their Previously Privileged Status and Provide Exposure for
Defamation Far Beyond What is Contemplated"
"In today’s world with the proliferation of social networking sites like Twitter and
Facebook and twenty four hour news channels on television and the internet the
expectation of the media and the public is that they will have unfiltered, instant access to
newsworthy information. The non-biased publishing of judicial pleadings by the news
media may enjoy certain public interest privileges, however, attorneys and others who
assist in facilitating this exchange of information may not be so fortunate."
Especially when they file a Judicial Pleading, then immediately publish it, and get their attorneys buddies to publish, this way they have Absolute Immunity under law and can defame whomever they want and are protected by the courts. FIGHT Back Folks, this is not lawful. SUE THEM.
"In Sunstar Ventures, LLC. v. Tigani, the Superior Court for Delaware, New Castle County, followed federal law in recognizing that the publishing of a judicial pleading to the press extinguishes the absolute litigation privilege.
In recognizing the privilege is waived when pleadings are published to parties like the press with no
connection to the judicial proceeding the Superior Court followed the rule in Delaware set forth in Barker v. Huang that the absolute judicial privilege will not protect an attorney who wishes to litigate his case in the press."
"With this decision Delaware joins
the overwhelming majority of states that have adopted such a position.5
attorneys who decide to enlist the press or utilize the internet as a litigation tool should be
aware that their potential exposure from defamation suits may come from parties that
were not previously named in the underlying lawsuit and may extend to other attorneys in
the firm besides the attorney who submitted the pleading to the press.
The common law tort of defamation comes from the recognition that “reputation and honor are no less precious to good men than bodily safety and freedom. In some cases they are dearer than life itself. It is needful for the peace and welfare of a civilized commonwealth that the laws should protect the reputation as well as the person of the citizen.”
A communication is defamatory “if it tends to so harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.” Liability for written defamation known as libel is typically broader than oral communication known as slander.
It is NOT ok, nor Lawful for attorneys such as Marc Randazza and his gang stalking attorney network to use the "press", other legal bloggers, Forbes, NPR, WIPO, New York Times and more, to litigate his case. Randazza even goes farther, he uses those publishings that he influenced as evidence to the courts to further incriminate, paint in false light and set up his targets.
"Besides truth, there may be other defenses to an action for defamation. Absolute and qualified privileges are affirmative defenses to defamation that set forth interests which society recognizes as superior to that of one’s own reputation.
However, the application of these interests must be narrowly tailored to serve the purpose for which they were created. If the privilege no longer serves the purpose for which it was created, it is waived.
When pleadings are drafted as part of a judicial proceeding any defamatory language within the pleadings is protected by the absolute judicial privilege, otherwise
known as the absolute litigation privilege."
"The publishing of these pleadings to parties and on forums unconnected with the judicial proceeding typically extinguishes the absolute litigation privilege. However, the publishing of filed pleadings by non-litigant parties under certain conditions may still enjoy protection under the more limited,
qualified fair report privilege.
A. The Absolute Litigation Privilege.
The absolute litigation privilege is a common law privilege that has been embraced “uniformly by state and federal courts.”17 The privilege protects judges, attorneys, witnesses, and parties from the threat of defamation suits as long as the communication was made in the course of a judicial proceeding and was relevant to a matter at issue."
Source and Full Article, Chocked Full of Case Law for you to FIGHT BACK.
Attorneys such as Marc Randazza get around this issue and create an online frenzy, another words use the Internet to litigate, then use that as evidence in the court. Randazza gets around it by having his "friends" do this dirty work for him. He gets attorneys such as Kenneth White, Jordan Rushie, Scott Greenfield and the gang; and media outlets such as Forbes and NPR, legal bloggers such as William Peacock of Thomson Reuters FindLaw legal network, and legal blogs such as AboveTheLaw and others. He gets them to paint litigants out as bad, evil, GUILTY before any kind of due process is even available to them and often times before they even know that Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and the gang have even sued them.
Stand up to these attorneys, EXPOSE Them.